How much of a constructist are you?

Rank yourself on the following dimensions. 1=not at all, 5= very much so

1) Contingency: what science says could have been otherwise. We could have had a physics without quarks. Perhaps even electrical engineering without electrons?  
2) Nominalism: does science cut nature at its joints? Or are these arbitrary distinctions? Where to cut river, estuary, ocean?  
3) Explanations of stability: past "truths" get overturned. Lamarck overturned by Darwin; Newton by Einstein. Does not getting overturned happend because the theory is Truth, or is it just because the rival hasn't shown up yet?  


Back to Ron Eglash home page