STS and Ethnography: Comparisons to Clifford
NAMES |
TOPICS |
ISSUES |
H. Collins, Pinch, 1974, 1982, 1991 |
TEA Laser, Gravity Waves, etc. |
Study communities of technoscience, not just laboratories. |
Latour and Woolgar (1986) |
rhetorical devices for converting observations to facts |
“Going native” – how to remain naïve outsider. See Clifford on Cushing |
Traweek, 1988 |
Particle physics labs |
Analogy to indigenous groups will piss off scientists (as Gusterson notes) |
Callon and Latour |
Non-human agency |
Language problem: “interessment”, “enrollment,” etc. Authorial authority problem (as identified by Collins in “epistemological chicken”) similar to Clifford’s comments (“Plato retains full control of the dialogue”) |
Heath (1997), Martin 1996, Downey and Lucena (1997), Forsythe (2001). |
Interventions |
Barely on radar screen for Clifford (except Piman Shaminism). “partner theorizing”, “hiring in”, “modest intervention”, etc. |