Women@internet questions on intro, ch 1-2
1)
pp.
1 what is this book based on? What were their goals?
2)
Pp.1-2
Why did they name the listserve “cyborg”?
3)
Pp.
3-4 Why did they compose a chapter using direct email “speech”?
4)
Pp.
4-5 compare how the idea of “place” was discussed by Marisa, Arturo, and
Gillian.
5)
P.
6 Where were Pi and Lis working, and how did these locations influence their
responses?
6)
Pp.
7-8 What is “ventriloquism”?
7)
Pp.
8-9 How does Kekula see the indigenous position in relation to this encounter
with the language of feminist academic theory? Pp. 10-11 How did others react
to her concerns?
8)
Pp.
11-13 How did Nidhi contribute to the critique of academic terminology, and how
did Arturo and Gillian defend its use?
9)
Pp.
15-16 How did Fatma characterize the modernization challenges she faces?
10) Pp. 23 How does Rius see the basic challenges to
women in old forms and new forms of communication? 23-24 What does she mean by
“zones of resistance?”
11) Pp. 24 How does Rius regard Audre Lorde’s “Master’s Tools” analysis and Haraways
“Cyborg” analysis?
12) Pp. How does Barbie illustrate the ways in which
global networks of informational capital create an illusion of diversity and
multiculturalism? What broader issues does this illustrate?
13) Pp 26-27 What does the quineańera example
illustrate?
14) Pp. 27-29 In what ways are the Zapatistas
“cyborg Indians”? What feminist issue does Rius find here?
15) Pp. 33-35 What is Castell’s view of
“informational capitalism?”
16) Pp. 35-36 How does Virillio see information
technology changing our experience of space and time?
17) Pp. 37,40 How does Latour see networks in the
creation of science and technology?
18) Pp. 41-44 How does Escobar see possibilities for
using Latour’s networks in defense against the erosions threatened by Virillio
and Castell’s dystopic visions?
19) Pp. 46-48 How do feminist politics enter into
Esocbar’s analysis of the interactions between localization and cyberspace?
20) Pp. 50-53 How does Escobar attempt to extend his
observations on the politics of biodiversity to other realms of feminist
science and technology studies?